Inside Political Strategy with Godfrey, Dante Nero, and Olayemi Olurin: Voting, Supreme Court, and the Power of Local Action.

In this episode of ‘In Godfrey We Trust’, comedian Godfrey and his co-host Dante Nero are joined by  guest political commentator Olayemi Olurin, as they dive deep into some of today’s most pressing political issues, from the implications of Project 2025 to the power of local political engagement.

Opening with a breakdown of ‘Project 2025’, Olurin explains how the Republican strategy mirrors historical movements, such as the Christian Heritage Foundation’s efforts in the 1970s. She emphasizes that the party’s focus on long-term planning has effectively shifted the political landscape over decades. This strategic blueprint, they argue, demonstrates how Republicans have crafted a systematic approach to influence and maintain power.

The discussion then shifts to ‘voting strategy and the Democratic Party’, where Olurin proposes a tactical approach: voting for Democrats, despite their flaws, as they are generally more responsive to public pressure and more open to collaboration with organizers on policy issues. They note that Democrats have rarely secured the majority white vote but instead rely on strong support from Black voters, a demographic critical to their electoral success.

The conversation also tackles the ‘Supreme Court’s role’ in shaping civil rights, with Olurin warning of the long-term consequences of recent Supreme Court appointments. They highlight that Supreme Court decisions have begun dismantling rights long taken for granted, underscoring how these shifts could unravel rights beyond those immediately affected.

When discussing ‘local versus national politics’, Olurin stresses the power of local engagement, noting how people often focus on presidential races while overlooking policies and reforms, like bail reform, that directly impact their lives. This issue of ‘bail reform’ has been central in New York, where recent changes made non-violent misdemeanors non-bail eligible. Olurin critiques the media’s selective portrayal of these reforms, asserting that much of the public perception around bail reform stems from misleading narratives.